The Impacts of Daily Reading on Academic Achievement by @MrsHollyEnglish

Re-Blog: Comprehensive exploration of daily reading by Holly Fairbrother


Anderson, L., & Horney, M. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (1), 153-60.

Anderson, R., Hiebert, C., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington DC: National Institute of Education.

Bedard, C., & Fuhrken, C. (2013). When writing with technology matters. Portland, MA: Stenhouse Publishers.

Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. G. (2012). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22 (2), 139-160.

Bus, A. G. (2009). How onscreen storybooks contribute to early literacy. In A. G. Bus, & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners (pp. 153-67). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Battye, C., & Rainsberry, M. (2013). Reading for pleasure puts children ahead in the classroom, study finds. Retrieved November 9, 2014, from Institute of Education University of London:

Chua, S. P. (2008). The effects of the sustained silent reading program on cultivating students’ habits and attitudes in reading books for leisure. Clearing House, 81 (4), 180-184.

Daniels, E., & Steres, M. (2011). Examining the effects of a school-wide reading culture on the engagement of middle school students. Research in Middle Level Education, 35 (2), 1-3.

Edutopia staff. (2008, March). Why integrate technology into the curriculum? Retrieved from Edutopia: http:// introduction

Garan, E., & DeVoogd, G. (2008). The benefits of reading: Scientific reseach and common sense converge. The Reading Teacher, 62 (4), 336-344.

Goodwyn, A. (2014). Reading is now “cool”: a study of English teachers’ perspectives on e-reading devices as a challenge and an opportunity, Educational Review, 66 (3), 263-275, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2013.768960

Grudzien, P., and A. M. Casey. 2008. “Do off-campus students use e-books?” Journal of Library Administration, 48 (3/4), 455–466.

HarperCollins Publishers. (2013). Retrieved 2014, from Drop Everything and Read:

Hopkins, G. (2007, 10 15). “Sustained Silent Reading” helps develop independent readers (and writers). Retrieved November 09, 2014, from

ISTE. (2012). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS*S). Retrieved June 03, 2013, from International Society for Technology in Education:

Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). “Just plain reading”: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 350-377.

Kanolik, L., & Turker, E. (2011). The magic of whole school reading. Retrieved November 9, 2014, from The Guardian Teacher Network:

Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Posrtsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Labbo, L. D., & Place, K. (2010). Fresh perspectives on new literacies and technology integration. Voices from the Middle, 17 (3), 9-18.

Larson, L. C. 2009. “Digital literacies e-reading and e-responding: New tools for the next generation of readers.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53 (3), 255–258.

Larson, L. C. 2010. “Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response.” The Reading Teacher, 64 (1), 15–22.

Lewis, C., Hancock, S., James, M., & Hill-Jackson, V. (2008). Framing African America students’ success and failure in urban settings. Urban Education, 43, 127-153.

Little, C., McCoach, D., & Reis, S. (2014). Effects of differentiated reading instruction on student achievement in middle school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25 (4), 384-402.

Miller, D. (2009). The book whisperer: Awakening the inner reader in every child. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Reading and writing habits of students. The Condition of Education.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Table 112. Average reading scale score, by age and amount of time spent on reading and homework: Selected years, 1984 through 2004 . (b. a. Table 112. Average reading scale score, Producer) Retrieved October 14, 2014, from Digest of Statistics 2006:

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction. Washington DC: US Convernment Printing Office.

Patterson, N., & Pipkin, G. (2000). Reading the body electric. Voices from the Middle, 8 (2), 61-65.

Prensky, M. (2006, June 12). DIGITAL NATIVES, DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS: ORIGINS OF TERMS. Retrieved June 4, 2013, from Marc Prensky’s Weblog: (2002). P21 Skills Framework. Retrieved June 03 2013, from Partnership for 21st Century Skills:

Rief, L. (2000). The power of reading: Practices that work. Voices from the Middle, 8 (2), 49-59.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Modern Language Association

Snyder, I. (1996). Hypertext: The electronic labyrinth. New York: New York University Press.

Stahl, S. (2004). What do we know about fluency? Findings of the National Reading Panel. In P. M. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 187-211). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Sternberg, B. J., K. A. Kaplan, and J. E. Borck. 2007. “Enhancing adolescent literacy achievement through integration of technology in the classroom.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (3), 416–420.

Tablet Adoption Drives Ereader Sales by 400%. (2011). Retrieved from Online Marketing Trend: www.onlinemarketing-trends. com/2011/03/tablet-adoption-drives-ereader-sales-by.html

Thomas, C. (2000). From engagement to celebration: A framework for passionate reading. Voices from the Middle, 8 (2), 16-25.

Verhallan, M. J. (2006). The promise of multimedia stories for kindergartner children at risk . Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 410-419.

Wordsworth, W. (1888). The complete poetical works. London: Macmillan and Co.

Wu, Y., & Samuels, S. (2004). How the amount of time spend on independent reading affects reading achievement: A response to the National Reading Panel. Paper presented at the 49th annual convention of the International Reading Association. Lake Tahoe, NV.

About UKEdChat Editorial 2600 Articles
The Editorial Account of UKEdChat. “Mastery is an unattainable illusion”

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.